It looks Obvious - Latest Comments in Yet another definition to Web 2.0

Re: Yet another definition to Web 2.0

zeevveez — Sat, 24 Dec 2005 00:42:00 -0000

Dear Rogel,

Your "different note" quite surprised me, but since you are opening that door I allow myself to refer you to a photo of a newspaper article on
http://www.flickr.com/photos/zeevveez/76527724/

Re: Yet another definition to Web 2.0

Rogel — Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:10:35 -0000

Peer production is only one aspect of it. You are ignoring the â€œLong Tailâ€, â€œRich User Interfaceâ€, Tagging and some other features I forgot.
What I basically claim is that people uses terms freely without really understand what they are. The argument if Web 2.0 is a marketing slogan, Real technological development and business model or both is a different discussion.
on a different note, I'm looking at your product and it is very interesting concept. I wrote about this type of aggregations in the past.

Re: Yet another definition to Web 2.0

zeevveez — Fri, 23 Dec 2005 02:34:15 -0000

There are too many bad definitions for Web 2.0 and it's a waste of time to count them all. In order to proceed with this mission I think we'd better consider the concept of Peer Production about which Erick Schonfeld wrote on September 30, 2005
http://www.business2.com/b2/web/articles/0,1786.... See also http://qtsaver.blogspot.com/2005/12/peer-produc...

Re: Yet another definition to Web 2.0

Doug — Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:16:22 -0000

The user experience is just like alomst everything else labeled Web2.0, it's nothing new. The Web Standards Group has been focusing on that for years now. Actually from what I have seen on most of the Web2.0 sites I have looked at the user experience is anything but considered, I have yet to find one index page on any Web2.0 site that actually tells what the site is about or what they do, that is hardly focusing on user experience!