<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>It looks Obvious - Latest Comments in Words have Meaning</title><link>http://rogelsview.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:48:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Words have Meaning</title><link>http://www.rogelsview.com/in-the-news/words-have-meaning/#comment-1226660</link><description>Although this is a good point it is not completly accurate too. In 1998 Osama was already wanted after the terror attack on the embasies in Africa.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rogel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:48:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Words have Meaning</title><link>http://www.rogelsview.com/in-the-news/words-have-meaning/#comment-1226659</link><description>The thing is though, to be fair to the AP, the photo is from 1998 - and that is stated in the caption. The caption should have been reworded, but keep in mind that if Michelle Malkin or others had read that caption in April 1998, then no one would have bothered pointing out this flaw. The caption was probably trying to effect a past-time contextual reference, which of course appears naively anachronistic in the present.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aakash</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:43:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>