<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>It looks Obvious - Latest Comments in Unmeasurable</title><link>http://rogelsview.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://rogelsview.disqus.com/unmeasurable/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:51:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Unmeasurable</title><link>http://www.rogelsview.com/in-the-news/libertarianism/unmeasurable/#comment-1354932</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amen to that!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rogel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:51:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unmeasurable</title><link>http://www.rogelsview.com/in-the-news/libertarianism/unmeasurable/#comment-1354931</link><description>&lt;p&gt;... that's one thing (love, relationship, people) that really shouldn't be considered in economic terms. There's no one equilibrium to be found, and no dividend that can be compared with other (at least not in the overall). If it makes you happy, it is a good relationship. If you're lucky enough to consider your feelings as "love" (I am in my own personal life, but I dare not try to define what exactly that is) – you've made the best "deal" possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zoolish</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:43:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>