http://rogelsview.disqus.com/enMon, 05 Jun 2006 12:20:01 -0000http://www.rogelsview.com/in-the-news/libertarianism/human-right/unanswered-question/#comment-1227414<p>It is interesting, mostly when Google actualy cencorship, or providing cencored, information. I don't think he lied about the revenue, but he didn't talk about the market share (which will effect the revenue at the end). <br>Should these corporations make compromises? sure. but I would like to know if they have any line that they will not cross.</p>RogelMon, 05 Jun 2006 12:20:01 -0000http://www.rogelsview.com/in-the-news/libertarianism/human-right/unanswered-question/#comment-1227413<p>The following was noted in a recent NY Times Magazine article, 'Google founder Sergei Brin was quoted as saying, "Revenue, Brin told me, wasn't a big part of the equation. He said he thought it would be years before Google would make much if any profit in China. In fact, he argued, going into China "wasn't as much a business decision as a decision about getting people information. And we decided in the end that we should make this compromise."'</p><p>A decision for real change or just corporate back-pedalling?</p>CathyMon, 05 Jun 2006 12:10:13 -0000