It looks Obvious - Latest Comments in Too vague

Re: Too vague

david — Fri, 19 Jan 2007 02:34:48 -0000

join the project!

Re: Too vague

Ingrid — Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:09:01 -0000

Rogel, for some reason (and it's probably silly I should have thought so) I thought that, considering McCains' experience with torture and being imprisoned by 'the enemy', he should have known better. You're right, too long in power and too comfortable in those chairs..
Ingrid

Re: Too vague

Rogel — Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:09:20 -0000

Ingrid,
David link was to McCain's speech supporting the Bill. I never though that McCain was better than Bush in this respect, both of them are social conservatives that believe in big government. This is simply the results of being in power for too long, and its time for them to go home.

Re: Too vague

Ingrid — Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:01:14 -0000

I don't know what David linked to but Rogel, McCain and someone else (name escapes me) wrote an oped piece defending the Act in WSJ I believe yesterday or the day before, I know you read so look for it. And I agree with you, when you write up a legal document, every little inane thing is spelled out to a T. The absence thereof does not mean you have bad lawyers (in this case, not even close), but you do so for a reason. I am very disappointed that McCain gave into this and calls it a compromise which he alludes to is something by its very nature that will not make people happy. That is missing the point. This is not an area where you make compromises. It effects not only peoples lives, but again, extends the power and control of the government.
Ingrid

Re: Too vague

Rogel — Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:25:17 -0000

Thanks for the link David, I only edited your comment cosmetically.

Re: Too vague

David Nollmeyer — Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:45:41 -0000

McCain thinks

David