<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>It looks Obvious - Latest Comments in So obvious</title><link>http://rogelsview.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://rogelsview.disqus.com/so_obvious/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:34:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: So obvious</title><link>http://www.rogelsview.com/in-the-news/political-campaign/2008-campaign/so-obvious/#comment-1354992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No.&lt;br&gt;From what I was reading the so-called fair-tax aims to solve the collection, while its intention is to keep the total amount collected equal. However for me the problem is the spending - the idea that government "should" distribute wealth and attempt to regulate any aspect of society.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rogel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:34:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: So obvious</title><link>http://www.rogelsview.com/in-the-news/political-campaign/2008-campaign/so-obvious/#comment-1354993</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Since the fair tax isn't aiming to reduce the government..." Don't you feel that with many "fair tax" people, that is exactly the hidden agenda - that at the end of whatever legitimate complaints they may voice about the current tax system they add on the idea that the government shouldn't be spending all this money anyway and that what we really need is a tax system that will help shut off the flow of funding for many of the frivolous programs (like public education)?&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg Cruey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:54:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>