<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>It looks Obvious - Latest Comments in Short Note on Efficiency</title><link>http://rogelsview.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://rogelsview.disqus.com/short_note_on_efficiency/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 23:58:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Short Note on Efficiency</title><link>http://www.rogelsview.com/in-the-news/libertarianism/short-note-on-efficiency/#comment-1226762</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with you. My point is that sometimes we, or should I say I, rap in the argument of the inefficiency instead of being focused on the moral aspect.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;More to my point - even if the government with use the money efficiently it will be immoral. The fact that it was collected at gunpoint, regardless how efficiently it is being used, is the immoral action - and that is what we need to be focus at. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rogel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 23:58:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Short Note on Efficiency</title><link>http://www.rogelsview.com/in-the-news/libertarianism/short-note-on-efficiency/#comment-1226761</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Rogel, I would argue that the inefficiency of government is, in and of itself, immoral. Especially when combined with use of coercion and violence. Taking my wealth at gunpoint (which is what taxation is, once all the pretty platitudes are stripped away) and using it to build an elephantine mouse, against my wishes, is horrific.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 21:41:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>