<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>It looks Obvious - Latest Comments in Not who I had in mind</title><link>http://rogelsview.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:52:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Not who I had in mind</title><link>http://www.rogelsview.com/in-the-news/political-campaign/2008-campaign/not-who-i-had-in-mind/#comment-1227664</link><description>Edwards is as far from great as far can be. His "nanny state" message is the opposite of what we need.&lt;br&gt;Regardless of "electelability" Edwards should not get the support of those who looking to restore individual freedom.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rogel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:52:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not who I had in mind</title><link>http://www.rogelsview.com/in-the-news/political-campaign/2008-campaign/not-who-i-had-in-mind/#comment-1227665</link><description>I think Edwards is great but I just don't know what has changed since 2004 except that he is two years older.  The more I think about the Dems in 2008, the more I think the nomination is Al Gore's to lose: he was robbed in 2000, has been consistently right on Iraq (unlike Hillary), and will not have a problem with either cash or name recognition... I wrote a story on this at &lt;a href="http://www.minor-ripper.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.minor-ripper.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MinorRipper</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:45:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>