<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>It looks Obvious - Latest Comments in Don&amp;#8217;t let the facts confuse you</title><link>http://rogelsview.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://rogelsview.disqus.com/don8217t_let_the_facts_confuse_you/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:09:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t let the facts confuse you</title><link>http://www.rogelsview.com/in-the-news/libertarianism/liberal-democracy/dont-let-the-facts-confuse-you/#comment-1354732</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No they shouldn't, with maybe having "cohesion of military effectiveness" as an  exception. After all military organizations should be disciplined and therefore easier to enforce some code of behavior - a commander that his soldiers using methods of harassment, discord, blackmail and bullying has no discipline in his/her unit and should not be a commander.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rogel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:09:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t let the facts confuse you</title><link>http://www.rogelsview.com/in-the-news/libertarianism/liberal-democracy/dont-let-the-facts-confuse-you/#comment-1354731</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True. But even if all those "terrible" things (harassment, discord, blackmail, bullying or an erosion of unit cohesion or military effectiveness ) had actually happened as feared â€“ should sexual preferences be considered a good enough reason to prevent people from serving?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zoolish</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 11:51:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>