<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>It looks Obvious - Latest Comments in Democratic decisions, the French version</title><link>http://rogelsview.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://rogelsview.disqus.com/democratic_decisions_the_french_version/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 12:16:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Democratic decisions, the French version</title><link>http://www.rogelsview.com/in-the-news/libertarianism/liberal-democracy/democratic-decisions-the-french-version/#comment-1354689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What we are actually talking about is the tension between the decisions of the majority and the protecting the rights of the minorities.&lt;br&gt;For example: Is the question of same sex marriage is up to the majority to decide, or is it part of human rights that are protected? I tend to believe that in Liberal Democracy the balance favor the protection of the rights of the minorities.&lt;br&gt;That being said, I believe that the strength of Democratic Culture is in the process of managing disputes. It seems that in France they are favoring to test the majority's will by building barricades.&lt;br&gt;And I agree with your last comment - it is very similar to what is going now in Israel, and it isn't a good sign.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rogel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 12:16:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democratic decisions, the French version</title><link>http://www.rogelsview.com/in-the-news/libertarianism/liberal-democracy/democratic-decisions-the-french-version/#comment-1354688</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You knowâ€¦ this is also a good example of the way many misunderstand the modern concept of democratic regime. Democracies do allow for (some forms of) civil protest, but it is by far NOT what this system is about. Democracies, like any other regime type have (and must have) governments and these must carry out policies that will, at times, offend some. Those offended can inflict their will on government, but, in a well balanced democracy, this is done by elections. And that is what all those who desire this regime type should strive for... the transformation of power via electoral process. Not by violent protestâ€¦ &lt;br&gt;By-the-way, that sure goes for my what's going on here lately tooâ€¦&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zoolish</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 12:03:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>